I am researching 3524557 Pte Reginald Cartmell who was awarded the India General Service Medal (Clasp Burma 1930-32) with the 2nd Battalion and the General Service Medal (clasp Palestine) with the 1st Battalion prior to WWII. His medal group also includes the 1939/45 Star, the France and Germany Star, Defence medal and 1939/45 War Medal even though he was captured during the retreat to Dunkirk and spent the rest of the war as a PoW in Stalag XXA at Thorn in Poland.
Given his WWII record I would expect him only to have the 1939/45 Star and 1939/45 War Medal for WWII. His medals are mounted as worn and so I have assumed that he probably awarded himself the F&G Star and Defence Medal - after all he had spent a lot of time in Germany.
However, the photograph of 3525495 Pte G W Thurstance from the regimental image archive (MR01922) clearly shows Pte Thurstance in uniform with his medal ribbon bar showing that he had been awarded the General Service Medal (clasp Palestine and, later, Malaya), the 1939/45 Star, the F&G Star and the 1939/45 War medal even though he had also been taken PoW during the retreat to Dunkirk and held at Stalag XXA for the rest of the war (he would later be awarded a LSGC). Surely he wouldn't have been allowed to wear a France and Germany ribbon on his uniform if he was not entitled to it! His medal group now does not include the F&G Star but the groupt is mounted for display - so someone has probably removed the F&G Star?
So my questions are:
1) I had always believed that being a PoW in Germany did not give an entitlement to the F&G Star - did the authorities turn a blind eye to the practice of PoWs "awarding" themselves this medal?
2) Were most of the Manchesters captured during the retreat to Dunkirk held at Stalag XXA?
I'm confused.
Any information most gratefully received.
Many thanks.
Bob B